Contact
Email: friendsofcraighouse@yahoo.com Press contact: press@friendsofcraighouse.comThe latest “Scheme 3” proposals
Facebook group
Alternatives to save the site
Twitter Updates
- Some of their work, including Craighouse, to be taken over by @idverdeUK twitter.com/dhothersall/st… 5 years ago
- The curse of Craighouse strikes again: Another Craighouse company collapses friendsofcraighouse.com/2017/06/04/the… 5 years ago
- Don’t understand - why would any Cllr need whipped to oppose terrible #Craighouse development? Against protections… twitter.com/i/web/status/8… 5 years ago
- I meant Melanie said that centralizing power is "fundamentally undemocratic"! Trouble with tweeting & listening at same time 5 years ago
- .@SandyHowatSNP Fundamentally antidemocratic says @melaniemain 5 years ago
-
Recent Posts
- The curse of Craighouse strikes again: Another company collapses
- Council elections: 4th May. Reminder of how councillors voted
- Edinburgh Rugby moving to Myreside with hardly any travel plan in place
- In Memory
- Is Craighouse being bought by Quartermile developer?
- NEWSFLASH: IS CRAIGHOUSE PARTNERSHIP PLANNING CONSENT VALID?
- Object to the demolitions of parts of A Listed buildings at Craighouse: Deadline 3rd June.
- Removal of gates and chimney at Craighouse
- Why is Scotland’s Finance Minister, John Swinney, so keen to hide what he did in May 2013?
- Woodland clearance work at Craighouse
- The difficulties of recovering debts from networks of UK & offshore companies or their directors
- Decision not to take Judicial Review forwards – for now
- Summer, dandelions and fundraising plans
- Developer Tries to Get Out of Important Flooding Condition as Diggers Move Onto the Site
- Craighouse Judicial Review fighting fund reaches £5,146
Blogroll
Archives
- June 2017
- April 2017
- October 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- February 2016
- October 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
Monthly Archives: April 2013
The Cockburn’s detailed objection to the enabling development argument at Craighouse
The Cockburn Association has allowed us to publish their extremely extensive and well-written objection to the enabling development argument for the Craighouse planning application. The letter specifically emphasizes the official guidance that the council planners are following on enabling development, … Continue reading
Posted in Community groups, Consultation, Finance, Planning process
2 Comments
Access for Vol-au-vents?
“wine, chat, food, chat, whisky…” It is interesting to read, hot on the heels of the (disputed) allegations made about the conduct of Invicta PA in the House of Commons and our own article on lobbying in relation to Craighouse, … Continue reading
Posted in Community groups, Political process
11 Comments
Spring is in the Air
Came across this little fella (fellowette?) on the path near the tennis courts traveling towards Craiglockhart pond to breed. Each year these plucky amphibians undertake a mammoth journey to get back to their breeding pool where they were born. I … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Challenging “reprehensible” Behaviour of Lobbyists in the Planning System
There is a growing awareness of the problems of lobbying and lobbyists both in Scotland and UK-wide. The Scottish parliament has been looking into the issue, David Cameron promised to crack down on lobbying – and didn’t, and a recent … Continue reading
Posted in Consultation, LA&P, Mountgrange, Planning process, Political process, Sundial, Uncategorized
Tagged Invicta PA, Mountgrange, Napier, Sundial, The Craighouse Partnership
5 Comments
What is going on with the Figures? Application shows New-Build Making a Loss?
It has been said many times over this development that the new-build is there to subsidize the old. So why, when we see the scant figures* provided by the Craighouse Partnership in their application, is the new-build actually LOSS-MAKING? How, … Continue reading
Posted in Finance, Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Craighouse Listed Buildings are Profitable, Application Proves us Right
Finance is the watchword that has come up again and again at Craighouse. It can be hard drilling down into figures. People who don’t feel confident with them can switch off or – worse – take everything the developers say … Continue reading
Posted in Finance, Mountgrange, Sundial
4 Comments